Quote:
The women in the study, who were all pairs of identical and non-identical twins, were asked whether they had a G-spot.
If one did exist, it would be expected that both identical twins, who have the same genes, would report having one.
But this pattern did not emerge and the identical twins were no more likely to share a G-spot than non-identical twins who share only half of their genes.
|
What kind of obscure sample group is that? Since when have identical twins ever been 100% perfectly physical copies of each other, who have also developed exactly the same psychologically and sexually? I'll keep believing real medical science and the fact that i've actually *touched a blood engorged gspot before* over this wonky pseudo-science bull any day. The G-spot doesn't exist because a handful of pairs of identical twins dont both know how to work it? Sounds like the person running the study needs to go take some college logic classes.