Quote:
Originally Posted by dippin
The news that this thread is based on is not the courts finding taxes unconstitutional. It is a jury finding a man not guilty a crime. Contrary to popular belief, it does not set any precedents or anything like that. It'd be like claiming that OJ simpson being found not guilty was the same as overturning laws on murder.
|
Its a start. Federal income taxes unfortunately are directly link to the fed's collection agency - the IRS. So there really is to issues going on here the validity of income tax in general and the format under which its conducted. In MY view any story remotely close to this terrority is strong.
Even so I never stated it was setting precendents. This is a subject that has many layers and directions.
I expressed I liked hearing a story such as this. Is that acceptable? or . . .
I'm probably getting edgy.
You are most likely ONLY justifiably making your point and I'm wondering if this place is just a mecca for people to gather and jolt out sarcastic lines to one another. If its really about feeling satisfied from setting someone straight in the cyberworld then I should practice not to fall inito the shortcoming of taking things personally. Nothing wrong with openly stating if one thinks another view is . . . bullshit, right.
This is one piece of information I havent look into and probably wont so if you know please share how many other cases are similiar?
I disagree with your analogy, however that is just my opinion. I should know better than to enter a thread about this subject, it usually ends with a negative overtone so I will part for a while. My next post will be the reply I receive from the letter.
Dippin I appologize if a strayed too far from acceptable topic parameters or pulled too great a stretch.