View Single Post
Old 12-16-2009, 05:35 AM   #13 (permalink)
oliver9184
Psycho
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucifer View Post
Unfortunately, it also had Kevin Costner, strutting around like he was in his senior class play.
That's an outrageous thing to say!

This new version of Robin Hood appealed more when it was going to take a sort of revisionist approach, either taking the side of the Sheriff against Robin Hood (with Russell Crowe as the Sheriff) or else having Robin Hood start as an artificial construct - a sort of rumoured phantom - made up by the Sheriff, and him (the Sheriff) having to actually act out the role when the lie became too big to contain. It now looks like these ambitious - and frankly, appealing - ideas have been watered down to the extent that this is yet another straight retelling of a familiar version of the story.

I think the excitement generated by Russell Crowe is entirely justified and I look forward to him playing Robin Hood, but I still hold that director Ridley Scott is overrated. He is good at making films look expensive; he's good at handling top stars and high budgets; and the sets and production design in his films are generally beyond compare; but deep down he's still just a hack who got lucky a few too many times (Gladiator) - which is why he took the easy option with this Robin Hood, why he'll ALWAYS play safe story-wise and why he's one of the most conservative figures in working in Hollywood..... and why he's making a film of the board game Monopoly. I'll repeat that: he's making a film of the board game Monopoly. Go figure.
oliver9184 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62