View Single Post
Old 12-13-2009, 10:42 AM   #12 (permalink)
Baraka_Guru
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by guy44 View Post
Now obviously something similar can happen on a smaller scale in a market economy (see: Florida, Arizona, SoCal, etc.). But these phantom communities would never have come into existence if our financial services sector was properly regulated - while the Chinese ghost city was actually part of the government plan. Which, uh, leads me back to my original point of centralized economies being terrible.
But where do you find the balance between centralized economies and regulation?

We should probably use more accurate language to avoid confusion: what China does is more closely defined as a "command" economy, which is characteristic of communism. The government decides how capital is spent (with some exceptions).

A "centralized" economy can mean many things. In Canada, we have built a "strong central government." This is more akin to federalism than communism, and this is where regulation comes in play.

I'm not sure if you've been paying attention, but Canada's major banks for the most part have remained profitable throughout the global financial meltdown and recession--actually, they're making record profits. Just recently they've started to announce bonuses to executives and capital/finance departments, and yet no one is crying foul. This is because not one of them received a penny in bailout money. There was no need. The banking industry is well-regulated, and domestic and foreign commentators alike are beginning to suggest that our system should be a model to the world.

In China's case, I really think it's an odd combination of a command economy with rampant growth. We don't have many examples of this in recent years, and so when we hear of such things as cities being built and not used, we get a bit confused as to how that happens. But I'm sure other cultures don't understand how we can use other people's money to live above our means.

Is it a bad thing? Sort of, but not really. The land might eventually get used. But it might be a waste when all is said and done. Who knows?

Capitalism is known for wasteful outcomes as well. We just need to look at our disposable society.
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot

Last edited by Baraka_Guru; 12-13-2009 at 10:47 AM..
Baraka_Guru is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360