Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
First, you set me up asking for a yes or no answer to your question, then you make your assumption without seeking clarification. So, you think I have lost my objectivity.
First, let's understand that the basis of your question requires a subjective response but that aside for now let's explore the basis of my response.
First, let's understand that the basis of your question requires a subjective response but that aside for now let's explore the basis of my response.
In football there are the expressed "rules" of the game. Simple enough and not complicated.
Then we have things like the:
bio-mechanics of football.
physics of football.
social science of football.
business of football.
biology involved in football.
strategy of football.
physical science of football.
psychology of football.
language of football.
Oh, and we have the science of the weather, or the climate, and it's impact on football.
Then we have things like the engineering in football venues, have you seen the new Cowboy's stadium?
|
All I asked was:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
Do you really think the most advanced climate science known to man is as simple as the rules to football?
|
I did not mention the social science of football or the business of football, I specifically said "the rules of football", to which you glibly answered in the affirmative. The correct answer would be "no", of course, as climate science is substantially more complex than the rules of football.
Oddly enough, this demonstrates to me only further that you've lost your objectivity on the issue, but more broadly on the entire situation.