View Single Post
Old 12-04-2009, 02:15 PM   #36 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
this seems like a strange conversation. i don't see how rejecting certain positions outlined by economists or scientists amounts to denying the physical existence of economics as a discipline housed in certain buildings in certain areas that does certain things. nor does rejecting particular theories or explanations based on them outlined by the scientists of your choice is the same as denying the physical existence of science as a set of institutions.

and economics as a field of academic inquiry is a product of the 19th century. it mutated out of political economy. when the americans got hold of it, they stripped out the history and sociology bits of political economy and replaced them with the "neutral" language of number. economics as a subfield of academic work is not the same as thinking about economic activity---which is a subset of broader forms of social activity in any event (obviously).

i understand the position that strange famous appears to be arguing for...it's a mangled version of a marxist critique of science as it functions within a capitalist context. there are points to be made in this direction--he's just not making any of them, and the points he does try to make aren't particular considered.

it's not rocket science to say that in many areas of inquiry, scientific activity is entirely an extension of more general forms of capitalist rationality and in the repeating of this rationality scientific activity can and has produced politically and materially problematic outcomes.
but that's not the same as saying "science is hooey, all it does is wreck things."
and that's not the direction the marxist critique of the sciences ever headed in.
it's a kind of mangling then.
one done in a way that resembles the way my dryer wrinkles clothes--it does it as if wrinkling them were it's job. so here mangling a marxist critique of science as an institution within a capitalist context is being done as if mangling it were the point.

most curious.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360