Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
inadequate is always worse than no program at all. It wastes money that could be better spent on other things while you work out a adequate program.
|
depends on how you define inadequate, doesn't it? I could say that Program X is inadequate because it was funded to help 3,000,000 people but is only helping 2,000,000. The program is inefficient, but isn't helping 2,000,000 people better than helping no one?