I pretty much agree with Smeth's response, but this I still don't get:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous
Not everyone needs an active sex life to be happy, and I am sure many lesbians can be satisfied with the simulation of activities that can take place between two women, for some romantic love or physical attraction - which they find in another woman - may be more important than raw sex.
|
Your basic claim is that lesbians cannot have sex, but gays can. This is because lesbians lack the essential equipment, which is a cock.
So maybe lesbians don't exist. We need a new name for women who
should be fucked by men but
aren't because they aren't attracted to them and instead would like a
platonic relationship with their own gender.
"Lesbian sex" is an oxymoron.
"So-called" lesbians who attempt to penetrate their partners with anything other than a cock are merely emulating something from a "revolting" pornographic film.
Maybe lesbians
should switch teams. They are clearly on the losing side. They aren't even playing with the proper "equipment." How fair is that?
Have you notified your feminist colleagues about all of this?