View Single Post
Old 11-05-2009, 12:15 PM   #47 (permalink)
Cimarron29414
Still Free
 
Cimarron29414's Avatar
 
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
Quote:
Originally Posted by dippin View Post
It is not nitpicking. It is pointing out the dishonesty of choosing the high range of a possible number mentioned in a memo without any backing from 9 months ago over the actual report from the CBO that addresses this issue.

And it seems like you have absolutely no idea how the cap and trade works. The government will not be collecting anything directly from the tax payer. It will sell carbon permits to companies. How much of that the company will pass on to the consumer is up to the companies. And since this companies trade on the global market, at least part of them live outside the US. So it has nothing to do with tariffs.
Bullshit. The memo addresses the bill which congress voted on. If they are saying the bill is deficit neutral, then they HAVE to get the $200B from somewhere, so it's fair game to use it in my example.

I know exactly how cap and trade works. You imply that a company will absorb the costs out of the goodness of their hearts and not pass it on to their customers as a way to ridiculously counter that this bill isn't going to mean significantly less money in MY pocket. Who are these mythical people that will pay it, if not us? When coal electric plants pay 90% more taxes, you think they are just going to eat that price as the "cost of doing business"? When they build the nuclear plant to replace the coal plant, do you think it's going to be paid for through the American exports to the Chinese or French consumer? Ridiculous.

I know you are not naive, so one can only assume you are deliberately being dishonest in your support of the bill. Spend, spend, spend. It's always someone else's money.

Tying this all back up, my original assertion was that people would vote for a governor who was going to give them some of their state taxes back, since they believe they are going to pay (in my opinion) the equivalent of 20% more to the feds soon enough. Whether I pay my electric company so they can pay the feds doesn't change the fact that I paid it to the feds. I still have $175 to $1761 less dollars in my pocket and we are absolutely no closer to solving this global warming hoax than we were before they made it up in order to grow government and control the people.
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead.

"Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."
Cimarron29414 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360