Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
It's a double standard. In many professional environments, men are expected to cover everything but their hands and heads. The exception is in more casual environments, where baring the forearms isn't so risque.
Women? Even in many professional environments it is acceptable to show some leg, some shoulder, arms, some neck line, some cleavage, all depending on the environment.
But it's because they're women, right? They're supposed to be looked at and lusted after. We've been doing it for centuries.
Then you have women who always dress with the same standard as men: pants suits, or whatever. But they run the danger of being perceived as "conservative" or "ball crushers."
It's like in politics how we often talk about what female politicians are wearing, and how they're doing their hair. Not men.
Odd.
Bottom line: If you have cleavage, you're inviting people to look at your tits. I'm sure most know that. Those who don't, should really think about it.
|
Oh, you're all over it, brother.