Quote:
Originally Posted by Herk
It seems you don't understand the purpose of the analogies. You can ridicule them all you want, but continuing to avoid answering the obvious questions is not helping the discussion. I drew a picture to make the point even clearer.
|
that there is a line between the appropriate and the inappropriate somewhere is beyond obvious and doesn't need analogies to be defended. I think what people have an issue with is trying to equate mcdonald's with any of those extremes. To keep pushing extreme analogies is not helping the discussion either. So why don't you say, precisely, why you think that the mcdonald's fundraiser is wrong, and then people can go from that?