Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
at what point did the federalist papers get elevated to the status of law or a guide to interpreting it?
when were the federalist papers ratified as part of the constitution exactly?
if the federalist papers aren't part of the constitution, and if the constitutional order begins with it's ratification, so begins with the document ratified and not the preliminary debates, what difference does it make what alexander hamilton thought about the general welfare clause and its position? i mean, beyond it being of historical interest, the kind of thing you'd maybe write about were you a legal historian or constitutional historian or working on the late 18th century political culture under the articles of confederation...
|
I actually agree with you entirely. While they do serve as a guide to better understanding why the Constitution was written the way that it was, they do not serve as law themselves. There are many conversations here which question the reaction the framers would have to our current government and the Federalist Papers offer insight into what that reaction would be.
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead.
"Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."
|