Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
Before we can continue, a question - do you agree that the parameters upon which the study was based is inadequate? I am not suggesting that they should not have done the study, but my take on it is that more work should be done on the issue. The study actually reminds me of my 12 year-old when he puts little or no effort into something and then concludes "well it didn't work".
|
Are you referring to the mathematica study? That one was done on request by the federal government, so I doubt they had any hidden agenda to prove the federal government wrong. And if you read the study, the reason they focused on the ages they did was because
the abstinence programs they were evaluating target the kids of that age! And these kids were followed for a long time to reach those results.
Quote:
I think those pledges are gimmicks, and I think the quote you have taken from the study illustrates that the people taking the pledge did not take it seriously.
However, again I think the results show no real impact one way or the other:
|
I agree the pledges are gimmicks. But they are analyzed because they
are used in many abstinence only programs. And the results regarding sexual activity did not differ, but the results regarding condom use did
Quote:
I think the author of this study may see potential in what my position actually is, I support promoting abstinence along with education. I also doubt any school or cumminity program can be effective without parental involvement.
|
How in the world did you get this from that particular sentence? That sentence was about an international study that pointed out that results may not be generalizable to the US, and more evaluation was needed. It said nothing about your position of promoting abstinence.