Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimarron29414
For the third time, when I said the quotes above, I was referring to the videos where no criminal activity occurred. That is very clear in my posts.
You know, for people who said these acts are indefensible - you guys are putting up quite a fight on their behalf.
|
And how is the fact that you are referring to tapes where "nothing happened" contradict my statement that "how can anyone defend at the same time the ideas that ACORN as a whole is to blame for this and that the videomakers shouldn't release their entire footage at the same time is beyond me?"
What fight? My position has been, from the start, that I believe in due process, and that I won't form an opinion on acorn as an organization until the full tapes are released. I have no problems finding what the individuals did indefensible, but I need more to consider this an organizational feature. That you think that this is akin to an endorsement of acorn or a fight in its behalf tells more about just how hellbent you are on condemning them than anything else. And so much resistance on the videomakers' part in releasing the rest of the footage tells me something is not right.