Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimarron29414
I know that the people on the video are guilty. Looking at 600 people NOT committing crime does not diminish the crimes committed on the videos that we saw. I have a video of a monkey humping a football, it proves these people innocent.
|
I'm glad you know but we still need to see the unedited footage before we can say they are guilty. There isn't a judge in this country that would accept those videos as evidence. They would require the unedited versions of them in order to be admissible.
I'm surprised you don't see how only having edited footage is a bad thing. You can edit a video to say anything you want. I bet given enough footage I could make mother Theresa look like Hitler.
If you are going to use this footage to say the people in the video were bad then release all the unedited footage involving those people. If you are going to use this footage to say ACORN is bad then release all the footage including offices that didn't bite on this scam.
We really have 2 options here. We can either use the facts to create our opinions or we can use our opinions to create our facts. Which do you think is better?