Quote:
Originally Posted by ManWithAPlan
"Science" is a human construct, but before we discovered what gravity was, assuming we know now, it still existed didn't it? "Science" is simply giving phenomena a name.
|
Yes, gravity probably existed. No, science isn't simply giving phenomena names. Science is about modeling the interactions between phenomena.
Quote:
|
WORDS are a human construct. This whole thread is questioning whether or not what HUMANS call INFINITY exists. So I don't see where you're going with this. That goes for your last commend on frame of reference too. Sure, that's just what we call it, but that doesn't change the fact, does it? A rose by any other name, right? How we think of things doesn't change their nature.
|
I'm just trying to understand your proof that time is infinite, because it doesn't make sense to me. Your claim is that time must be infinite because if it wasn't then there would have to be some sort of "frame of reference" to "admit" it, and since there are an infinite number of frames of reference, then... ?
It doesn't make sense to me, and it's possible that's because language can be the limiting factor in transmitting ideas. It could also be because your proof doesn't actually make sense, but I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.