Originally Posted by The_Dunedan

So it's yet another law/statute/ruling to prevent someone from doing as they see fit with their private property which they paid for and which they maintain. IOW, it would be illegal, were Halx an ISP, for him to disallow the posting of pictures of children, which was standing TFP policy for some time. Note; "prevent...from discriminating against particular internet content". I also note that Gov't bureaucrats and actual human beings almost always have wildly differing interpretations of "reasonable." Free Speech Zones were "reasonable" under the Bush Regime, remember?