09-15-2009, 09:48 AM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
Still Free
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by biznatch
Sorry, but imagine debate class in school. If you have one student in favor or, say, health care reform, who presents his arguments with facts, examples, statistics, and turns it into a coherent case, of course people will pay attention, and they'll have something to respond to.
If the opponent's response is something to the tune of "but the reform will entail death panels!" or "everything done by the current President is communism!" without backing it up, he's gonna get ridiculed.
We're not ostracizing, it's just hard to listen to highly emotional, non-factual, hardly coherent babble, the only purpose of which is to make people angrier.
---------- Post added at 05:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:40 PM ----------
See, that's fine. It's also more coherently formulated than practically anything I've seen in the whole "movement."
I don't have a problem listening to people like you, who state valid concerns, it's the mass of ridiculous pre-made thoughts worded by pundits and copy-catted by protesters, via signs, chants, and blog posts that make me cringe.
|
Technically, this was the basis of the tea party movement. TEA - Taxed Enough Already. Many have jumped on the movement to air their grievances with the current federal government. These people march under the same banner, but their grievances are about a variety of different issues: environmental, death panels, illegal aliens, etc. They aren't really addressing or considering the core problem which is the realization that eventually borrowed money has to be paid back. The initial movement has always been about "We can't possibly pay for all of this!?!?"
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead.
"Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."
Last edited by Cimarron29414; 09-15-2009 at 09:56 AM..
|
|
|