Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
|
Will, I read the Reuters article and the examples they gave seem to be almost criminal in nature. What is really going on here? I wonder what percent of the 31.2 million claims rejected are medically justified. Is it the insurance companies position that doctors ordering these procedures are making wrong diagnosis and/or wrong recommendations for treatment? Surely they are not denying valid claims just to improve the bottom line. Wouldn't lawyers have a field day with these cases?