Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
I bet I could give a thousand reasons why I think Obama is not worthy of my trust, I bet I could give a thousand reasons why I don't support his view concerning the role of the federal government, I bet I could give a thousand reasons why I don't support some of his important policy initiatives, I bet I could include some reasons why I think he has been good for American politics (i.e.-motivating many young people to get involved in politics when they would have been apathetic), and the best response I would get is - "you don't like Obama"... "Obama=bad"..., therefore suggesting, that is the only reason I don't support him and his policies. That is pretty weak. The only thing weaker, in my opinion, is when respondents ignore issues and focus on personal attacks. Which, I bet will follow. I don't think they can resist it, can you?  |
The biggest flaw in any of your arguments is when you are asked a direct question you can not answer it. You have no valid response so you must deflect to a totally irrelevant topic and claim some sort of false victory in your head regarding the debate.