Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
Not according to the law.
|
because congress would NEVER write an unconstitutional law.......
---------- Post added at 11:33 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:30 AM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
In fact, there is a change for 2010:
The 2010 Census will be a short-form only census and will count all residents living in the United States as well as ask for name, sex, age, date of birth, race, ethnicity, relationship and housing tenure
|
the above info is necessary, why? and what authority do they have to obtain that info?
---------- Post added at 11:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:33 AM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Dunedan
Some folks have been making an uproar since long before that, and have certainly included the monstrous USA PATRIOT Act in the aforesaid; folks like William Norman Grigg, who was fired from his position at the John Birch Society for his steadfast opposition to the actions of the Bush Regime. J. J. Johnson also comes to mind, likewise Dr. Ron Paul (14th Dist. TX).
|
now Dunedan, you know that democrats and republicans alike discount anything we Libertarians have to say of just about anything. After all, we're just crazy radical anarchists.
---------- Post added at 11:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:36 AM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood
I understand that it's not something we want to happen, but generally, political corruption is motivated by political gains, so I'm asking what would be gained by gerrymandering the districts to get one full of non-voters? It's an honest question, not a defense of the corruption.
|
If a political party can gerrymander a district of 100,000 people, 95,000 being illegal aliens and thus 'non-voters' while the the remaining 4500 are registered democrats....viola instant permanent democrat seat.