Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood
posting their website was halfway facetious, but they do have a "leader" (Orly Taitz) and some US legislators support. I don't know what else you think they need to be a "movement". Their efforts won't be successful, but that doesn't make their organization of people and resources any less real
---------- Post added at 07:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:11 PM ----------
So is Pro Life not a movement because they haven't had the political power to change the issue?
|
I actually choose my words carefully. I said "change the political dynamics" of an issue. "Birthers" are out there just like there are people who have been "anally probed by aliens" , neither group has any impact on the political dynamics of any debate on any subject. However, people like "right to life", or even people who want to "save the whales" do affect political dynamics.