For my part, my objection is not pictures of kids on the site, per se. I love taking pictures of my daughter and I post them everywhere BUT here. If the rules were changed, I would most likely post pictures of her here.
Crompsin sort of hit on my reservations about the subject. And maybe it's not fair or wrong or hyperbolic, what have you, but I am seeing photos of 'hot' sixteen years olds posted and folks making comments at will with no 'rules' about underaged content. Fuck, a certain percentage of photographs on the titty board are of women who look to be underage, let's talk frankly. It's not really a trend I look towards with enthusiasm. Enough to uphold the longstanding rule against under-18 content? Yes.
---------- Post added at 05:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:22 PM ----------
that said, I do trust the moderation of this board, and go along happily with whatever decision is made.
__________________
Most people go through life dreading they'll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They've already passed their test in life. They're aristocrats. - Diane Arbus
PESSIMISM, n. A philosophy forced upon the convictions of the observer by the disheartening prevalence of the optimist with his scarecrow hope and his unsightly smile. - Ambrose Bierce
|