|
rahl---you have got to be joking.
you have been running a tiresome little game of trying to control the way in which this discussion unfolds. you've been called on it repeatedly, and you've responded either by being an ass or ignoring the posts.
this in response to posts that have even tried to be polite.
given your m.o. in this thread, it's kinda hilarious to find you then turning around and taking a series of arbitrary potshots at me.
i wonder that if your technical knowledge is as dubious as is your ability to conduct yourself in a debate when you start to loose control of how it's framed.
i know.
let's start over.
how about you fill me in again on why an insurance man is a necessary reference point for discussing a social and political problem again?
how is it that social and political problems surface for you in your professional line? they're administrative problems, arent they? they kinda get dissolved, don't they?
isn't it the case that you have a personal. economic interest in the maintenance of the existing arrangement?
and that the company you work for also has such interests?
so where exactly is your competence in talking about the politics of health care?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|