Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
i'm curious: is there any other way of interpreting the introducing of this libertarian nonsense into this debate than as a rationale for basically arguing that the poor (or uninsured) are as they are because they're less than those manly men who pull themselves up by their bootstraps blah blah blah so fuck em, let em die...who cares about the physical well-being of the less-than-us, the social parasites.
hell, why not speed that fine thinking up and set up camps where these inferiors can learn some manly virtues?
|
See this is the problem with political or religious debate. If someones views are different from your own you have to resort to name calling or the belittling of other political parties or ideals. I've got new for you, you're not always right. No one is, so instead of being a condescending dick to everyone you feel you are above inilectually, simply state your views, and your reasoning behind them