i'm curious: is there any other way of interpreting the introducing of this libertarian nonsense into this debate than as a rationale for basically arguing that the poor (or uninsured) are as they are because they're less than those manly men who pull themselves up by their bootstraps blah blah blah so fuck em, let em die...who cares about the physical well-being of the less-than-us, the social parasites.
hell, why not speed that fine thinking up and set up camps where these inferiors can learn some manly virtues?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|