I should have known this thread would turn into a debate on "what is proof" with all of the side stepping and bullshit flown around the philosophy section. When proving a magical being exists can't be done, then the best thing to do is attack the question, right?
__________________
"A Darwinian attacks his theory, seeking to find flaws. An ID believer defends his theory, seeking to conceal flaws." -Roger Ebert
|