Quote:
Originally Posted by noodle
WOW! I don't think I've really paid attention to nature shots done in infrared.
Pardon my ignorance, but is this done in the processing or a camera setting?
|
Neither (though processing is required). Digital sensors are very sensitive to infrared light, but in "normal" pictures it affects colors too much, so manufacturers have put filters in front of the sensor to block infrared light from reaching it. So you have 2 options:
- Modify your camera so that the filter is removed and replaced with a IR-only filter (which is what I have - though my allows some visible spectrum light in so I can get the colors in post processing). Downside is that this is tricky/expensive, but on the plus side you get normal exposure times.
- Attaching an IR only filter to the lens of an unmodified camera. The advantage is that this is easier and generally much, much cheaper. Disadvantage is that you will need much longer exposures to compensate for the IR blocking filter inside the camera.
Any camera can be modified to do the first option. To do the second option, certain cameras have weaker filters than others.
Here's a good list with model comparisons
jr-worldwi.de: Photography: Technic
---------- Post added at 07:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:34 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by genuinegirly
The second image is my favorite.
|
Thanks. The rest of the pictures that I took today can be found here:
deogopoles : photos : Infrared Medlock Park