View Single Post
Old 07-28-2009, 05:47 PM   #18 (permalink)
Plan9
I Confess a Shiver
 
Plan9's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by G5_Todd View Post
we had the collapsible stocks and short barrels on ours, and used the nutsacks... i think its odd that you have to take extra measures with this weapon so it doesnt accidentally go off and kill everyone in your gun truck...the only thing that makes this weapon bareable is having those three items with it...
Yeah, the twist-collapsible stocks are total garbage. I liked the M4 ones better. I had my guys keep the old clubfoot fixed stocks until the M4-style stocks became available in 2006. The full stock is actually useful for shooting (durable, provides solid cheek weld) and I find it more comfortable to carry than the folding stock given the sling attachment point difference. The pathetic ring placed right in the way of the feed tray cover releases and rear sight... what genius came up with that? Obviously not anybody who has to fight with the gun. The aluminum ring vs. steel hooks thing used to kill me, too.

100 round nutsacks were crucial to carry comfort (at one point each guy had three: one in the gun, two in pouches), as well as silencing the plastic drums with taped cardboard. I can't stand the SAW rattle that people put up with in country. It's like they forgot about E1 shit like noise discipline and jump tests.

I didn't really get the point of the short "para" barrels that everybody was fighting over. It looks cool, but is dangerous when mounted in a turret behind a chicken plate, ya lose the extra couple inches of accuracy (sight radius, rifling) as well as muzzle standoff, and seemed to be more flash messy (moon dust everywhere) for leapfrogging due to the blast it throws. If real life was like the movies, the short barrel would have made more sense.

I fail to see how the SAW is unsafe... or less safe than any other MG (M240B, M60D). With the SAW, you leave the belt tray'd with the bolt forward... safety off... cock and fire when appropriate. It's idiot proof and recommended for 90% of situations in the politically correct GWOT where negligent discharges are feared more than a convoy ambush. None of this half-cock bullshit, don't ride with it loaded inside a vehicle, etc. My guys were never to use their safety on the 249 unless they had actually been firing it or were directed to do so by some idiot fobbit NCO in order to keep the peace. We're not gun shy.

What issues did you have?
__________________
Whatever you can carry.

"You should not drink... and bake."

Last edited by Plan9; 07-28-2009 at 09:52 PM..
Plan9 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360