Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
Will is presenting his "factual" arguments saying he was not a threat. I tell him he is not responding to the correct question, and even if it is not rational to him, he tries to ignore the reality of what drives my decisions and my responses. On the other hand, I accept his point of view even though I think it is as irrational as he thinks my point of view is. I conclude I have a more empathetic and open point of view than he does, although liberals live with the pretense of the opposite
|
Let's say Obama
felt some country was a threat, and attacked it, in the process losing thousands of civilian and military lives, and hundreds of billions of dollars.
If evidence came out later that the country never was a threat in the first place, or a minor one, wouldn't you be pissed?