|
You know - it is very instructive how many personal comments are made about me in this thread.
Now, I want to make it clear I am not complaining about it, I am not offended or upset about it - but while again and again I relentlessly stick to the point, the peope arguing against me cant answer my arguments directly so are reduced to insults, or really very silly comments (such as claiming I would be beaten up by a 130 lbs woman... as if such an event was possible. Anyone who knows me know I would not fight a woman under any circumstances.)
It shows how fragile the defence of MMA is.
MMA is unmanly, it allows a fallen opponent to be struck. Yes, I do repeat this because it is absolutely key to my objection to this spectacle of hooliganism called UFC. It is not "me stating my own opinion and ignoring fact" - from the first age you are raised as a boy, from the scraps you have in the schoolyard - any man knows that you do not hit or kick an opponent when they are fallen, and to do so is cowardly. I am not talking about grappling on the floor as practised by jin jitsu fighters... I am talking about a man being tripped up or dragged down, or even in the worse cases knocked down, and then punched while he is on the floor.
And remember these MMA fighters wear such light gloves it is the equivalent of being hit bare knuckle virtually.
If UFC will not make a rule amendment that strikes are only allowed when both men are standing and that when on the floor fighters can only grapple, then it should not be allowed to take place. Quite simply it should not be legal without this rule change.
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."
The Gospel of Thomas
|