genuinegirly

You members should be applauded.

I am glad that no one hesitated to make harsh comments on my thread. You could have been intimidated to do so because I am a mod. Instead, the conversation moved in a direction that I appreciate. People pointed out to me the flawed logic in the article and advised me not to jump to conclusions based on reading alone.

Now it's my turn to share a bit of my logic.

It is the moral duty of a multinational corporation to investigate thoroughly before jumping into an outsourcing opportunity. If they have the slightest notion that there might be human rights violations in a company, they must not do business with them. If they see human rights violations rampant in a specific country with which they would like to do business, they must make an active choice to not do business with that country. A multinational business can make it widely publicly known through press releases that they are unwilling to do business with a specific company or nation until they address their widespread human rights violations.
This places pressure on the governing body of that nation to address these issues.
I hope that you are willing to jump in and make comments. Feel free to respond to the opening statement. Feel free to let loose - just pick on the statements rather than directing your distain for a viewpoint at the person expressing their views.

__________________
"Sometimes I have to remember that things are brought to me for a reason, either for my own lessons or for the benefit of others." Cynthetiq

"violence is no more or less real than non-violence." roachboy