It's deduction taken only from the information in your posts in this thread. The fact that several other individuals here seem to have come to the same or similar conclusions suggests my observations and conclusions are not so far fetched.
Accusing someone of racial bias is not, in and of itself, racist. Professor Gates came to the conclusion—which may or may not ultimately be correct, we can't know for sure—that the police officer's presence was racially motivated in some way. When you take into account that there may also be a pattern of racial profiling around Cambridge, as the article mentions, his accusations may have been founded in reason instead of racism. The fact you're willing to overlook this tells us that, as Dippin correctly pointed out above, you "immediately assume the black man is at fault, filling in the blanks with whatever suits [you]." Look at what you posted:
Quote:
|
After the identification was given, the good professor decided to talk shit to the police while he was outside of his house, presumably calling the police officers racists and generally creating a nuisance.
|
Emphasis mine. This information came from your own mind, not any verifiable source.