Quote:
Originally Posted by squeeeb
hmmmm, that's it? one comparison to hitler? was i too obvious?
|
I see what your original underlying intention was... weird to see that not one other person has picked up on it yet.
I'm just now left wondering which will next: if people start catching onto your 'tilted premise', you start to offer up better solutions to combat this onslaught of obesity you seem to stand against proliferating, or some kind of misconstrual will result and someone is left even further out of the loop, stuck in some kind of stratosphere of debating a discussion they still think exists, but doesn't really.
Maybe I didn't read that much into your rant at all, and I actually sympathize with a point or three within your conglomerative stance on fattys.
---------- Post added at 08:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:58 PM ----------
Ah, it actually happened in the ten minutes and five replies in-between my message's receipt. Scenario #3 did, I mean.
Bravo.
interesting pickup:
(And a little discrepancy I've noticed about the "fat people eating more" thing; squeeeb expended an effort of one lonely sentence on this particular matter; it's very telling to see that a fair share of replies are seeking to engage this one matter of discussion, other than the plethora of other 'supposed sins' squeeeb pointed out that those who are "mass-index challenged" negatively affect in one way or another. Fat people, or just consumer-hungry oriented persons in general, do alot more and affect in a more widespread manner than the obvious "eating a ton/buying a farm's worth of supplies" generalization that is firstly/foremost attributed to such a group. It goes deeper, but I suppose scratching the surface is where we all must start.)