This is a pointless argument boys. Anyone who refuses to acknowledge a difference between a 'downed' opponent and a 'defenseless' opponent is simply not going to understand MMA.
Anyone who uses boxing as their example of bravery and skill simply will not ever understand MMA. MMA uses a multitude of skill and strengths while boxing uses. 2. move and punch. But, like I said, there's no point in arguing.
and thirdly, anyone who thinks that 2 months of training will create a belt around their waist, is probably on the best damn acid I've never had, and I'm jealous. If anyone who trained for 2 months would wear a belt, then we'd have thousands of ex-champions. Obviously, boxing requires training for years and years to become a champion but other sport does not. Obviously MMA is a just a cake walk that requires little dedication, even less skill, and even less if any attention.
So here's what I would do, and suggest to the rest of you: Don't feed the boxing troll. We can obviously support that boxing requires skill and strength but the troll cannot and has not ever in the past. We'd all just be better off ignoring this thread and letting it die into oblivion where it belongs.
|