Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
I guess my point is that treating The Law like some immobile and invariable body of extrinsic facts is absurd. Especially when you're talking about a position that is charged with interpreting The Law.
|
I actually think this line of thinking is absurd. It's the equivalent of saying 'that was the law last year, this is the law now'. It doesn't work.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|