Darkblack
I think the issues are (i) "depicting current events" and (ii) generalization.
i) The cartoon does not depict current events. The peace process is stalled because of violence and fear (e.g. the recent Palestinian shooting of Israeli soldiers), not because the Israelis (or as this cartoon would have you think - the Jews) haven't been given enough money. In fact the issue of money hasn;t been in any newspaper articles I have read is only relevant as part of the continuing framework of talks - there will need to be money to rebuild Palestine, that is all.
ii) When an artist makes a statement about a group that should strictly only apply to a few members of the group then that is unfair generalisation or stereotyping and leads to the charges of racism, sexism or anti-whatever. In the church case it is only a small minority of priests who are paedophiles and if the cartoons intent was to say that priests generally are then it would be wrong. Of course if it was just trying to depict a one off incident (and this was clear from the cartoon or the usual role of the cartoon in the paper - e.g. some always depict one of the day's stories others always make wider political statements) then it is okay.
This to everyone here:
Ask yourself what it is about this cartoon that makes it antisemitic (if anything does) and then ask yourself whether any of those features apply to the earlier cartoon:
