Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
Does not seem that you have read what I have written. I have no problem with children being taught about birth control from a science point of view, nor STD's and prevention from a scientific point of view. In a perfect world the government should not be in the business of encouraging or discouraging sex in any manner. One the one side the government should not be involved in "family planning clinics" or promoting "wait until you are married". I think both extremes are an inappropriate role for government.
|
The question isn't "what are your views on sex education".
The question is: how do you square that (IMO rational, sensible) view with your support of Palin's (radical, nonsensical, and--as evinced by her own daughter--failing) views? That's the part I don't get.
---------- Post added at 08:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:11 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
If I may, each of these was published after it was publicly reported that her daughter had become pregnant. I would hope she changed her tune because she was able to realize she'd made a mistake, but more likely it was simply political.
|
Wait. Surely you're not implying she's something other than a paragon of these so-called "convictions" we've been talking about? That she changes her tune for political expedience? NO!!