"Go out into the wilderness and you will find out what your rights are in nature."
Second!
---------- Post added at 10:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:17 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vana
Both the objectivist line, and the subjective line are completly consistent, equal, opossite, necessary, simultaneous, and contradictory.
I favor romantic philosophy over analytic.
There might be a God's-eye, nirvana perspective beyond?
|
Hey, good point flow Vana.
But could'ja spread out your language? Water down the substrate? 'Cause I think most people like to drink their Kool-Aid with a big more water than that,
know what I mean?
There is a nice little strand here that Vana has alluded to, though.
What about higher beings? What do they think of rights? Is that knowledge a birthright?
an instinct?
We know that humans are stuck in the chaotic system, the natural chaos, which means that the biggest, strongest influence(s) makes the rules for the rest. With human nature it's pretty unfair, but in proper nature there seems to be a good set of instinctive rules that all life forms abide by, what are
they?