Err... How is this different from the employer chosing to change healthcare supplier in any other way? If it's cheaper and supplies a comparable or better service, then keep it?
If it turns out to be awful, then scrap it and go back to the for-profit service.
Right?
Or will black helicopters be over the hospital everytime someone enters a hosptal under a govt plan and then follow them everywhere, making sure they get shitty healthcare and die... so they can't complain?
Really, folks... the "Socialised Medicine!" scare in the US looks utterly ridiculous to the rest of the world, and considering your healthcare is ranked below Cuba's.... Maybe you need a little of the rest of the world's solution.
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--
|