I don't see where the equalituy argument helps when it goes like this ... to treat women or men differently would be to offer either one more rights than the other. This cannot end well. Men and women are not equal biologically but there are some people who can excel better than some other people in the same field regardless of gender. The fact that there are more women/men in said field is useless, demographics are useless for determining who it is will be allocating resources. We look at the individual that is actually capable of handling such tasks. Equality falls here. i.e. If more men are chosen for a specific task it simply means that more able men than women showed up for the interview. This is the 21st century.
That said, snowy has it straight up ...
Sorry B_G got nothing to add to the OP ...
|