if i was going to put my money on anyone it would be nadal to win wimbeldon.
as much as id like to see federer win, i dont see him overpowering nadal. nadal would be fresh from the ealy exit in the french, while federer had to fight tooth and nail in some of those matches.
i also dont see nadal being bundled out of 2 slams in a row either. i also dont see federer beating him two matches in a row, since roger won the last one.
nadal purely on probability
__________________
An injustice anywhere, is an injustice everywhere
I always sign my facebook comments with ()()===========(}. Does that make me gay?
- Filthy
|