Thread: Guns in Church
View Single Post
Old 06-11-2009, 05:15 PM   #47 (permalink)
shakran
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel_ View Post
Maybe I missed something - there always seemed to me to be a clear link that makes the permission to bear arms conditional on the ability to form a militia.

You commented that the militia should exist. I agree. If this is the case, maybe you should say "If you have joined a milita organisation for civil defense, you can bear arms". That would prevent anyone saying "I need it for home defense" or "I want to go hunting". The point should be (to me) if you're not in a milita, the right to bear arms doesn't apply to you.
I happen to agree with your interpretation of the intent of the 2nd. The supreme court does not. They ruled that we can have guns. They didn't say we can have guns as long as we sign up for a militia. So, by judicial review, we are free and clear to have guns, and my original point stands.

Regarding your other comments to my post, you pretty much said what I am saying. Yes, I suppose having a gun in church if you believe that Jesus told you never to fight is hypocritical. But christianity as a whole is hypocritical as hell. You are correct when you say that Jesus never said anything about persecuting homosexuals, but he did say, as I mentioned, to love thy neighbor and to avoid passing judgment on people. A sizable percentage of American christians are vehemently anti-gay, and therefore are hypocritical. And if we want to get technical, you are judging this church and its congregation over the gun issue, and therefore so are you.

The point is that assuming Jesus existed, it is highly unlikely that he expected his words to be followed to the exact letter. It is further unlikely that what is written in the bible is exactly what Jesus actually said. If you synthesize Jesus's teachings down to their core, they work out to something along the lines of "Don't be an asshole, and treat people nicely to the extent possible." That's a better way to approach his teachings, I think, than to take the verbage literally and as-rote. After all "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" could be twisted to justify rape. "I'd sure like her to have sex with me so. . ."

All this boils down to the point that as long as these churchgoers are living their lives to the moral standard they believe their church requires of them, they are not hypocrites. Obviously the church does not include as part of that moral standard "don't carry any guns." We don't know how literally that church interprets the new testament, and so we can't really pass. . judgment. . on them on the hypocrisy question.
shakran is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360