Quote:
|
OK, I guess maybe I see how I could have offended some gun owners, seeing as this is the weaponry section.
|
Gee, ya think? You made absolutely no effort to distinguish between the "penis extenders" and "non-penis extenders" in your snide little comment, and we (gunowners) have been harassed with that inane, insane, bullshit canard for long efuckingnough. If guns actually -were- phallic substitutes, why would subcompact pistols be so popular?
"Hey, by dick's too small, so I'll buy a tiny lightweight .38 to make it feel bigger!" Right, I wanna buy a gun 1/2 the length of my prick to make myself feel well-endowed? I think not. Besides which, what do you figure's up with female gunowners (30% of total nationwide)? Are they buying "clit extenders," or are you falling for that outdated bullshit about "penis envy?"
Quote:
|
However, I think I do have a point about the types who feel it's necessary to carry a weapon to church.
|
Nope. Wrong. Sorry, you don't.
Quote:
|
Their idea of when it's appropriate and necessary to carry a gun is ass-backwards
|
Why? Has nobody ever been murdered or attacked in a church before? Dr. Tiller would disagree.
Quote:
|
I support gun ownership where owning one is not too dangerous, and has a legitimate reason to be owned.
|
Care to elaborate upon "too dangerous" and "legitimate reason?" Oh, that's right; "not scary to me personally."
Because nobody's -ever- had to defend their families, oh no...
Define please...oh, right, "not scary to me personally."
Quote:
|
and don't live in the middle of a big city
|
Where the majority of violent crimes occur, and where a defensive firearm is most likely to be needed...
Let me see if I've got this straight: you're fine with gun-ownership so long as the owner
A: Doesn't scare you for some reason,
B: Has what you consider to be a "legitimate" reason (which does not seem to include self-defense since)
C: Lives in the middle of nowhere, and not in an area where they're more likely to need to use the weapon defensively.