Quote:
Originally Posted by n0nsensical
It was a little too over-the-top comic booky for my taste, but I think the cast was perfect, especially Kirk. It's not easy to imitate His Great William Shatner/Kirkness, but they pulled it off, classic Kirk. Spoiler: It's pretty funny that they managed to put a lot of Leonard Nimoy in but no Shatner. Who's pulling the strings in Hollywood? I still don't know WTF is up with the plot, it was an alternate timeline? I was hella blazed (not really) and that didn't help much in that one scene in the middle where they fired off a ton of pseudo-sciency time-travel explanation of what was going on. So are we going to have to suffer a bunch of future Trek series and movies in this alternate timeline? Kirk's father didn't actually die in the "Canon" timeline, am I right? Now scotty has a real scottish accent.
What I really want to see next, and I'm sure I've mentioned this before, is a movie or series set in the Star Trek universe but that is not primarily about any members of Starfleet. Maybe Picard's brother.
|
I heard the reason for Spoiler: Shatner's absence was due to his being pissed that his part wasn't big enough. I read they had basically a cameo for him in a memorial hologram and he wanted a bigger part.
__________________
The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed. -Stephen King
|