aceventura3

There is no need for the government to hold title to the land. Even if the land was privately owned, the government could mandate how the land is used. They could even mandate that the public have access to it by mandating public roads through the property or just taking some of the land to build roads.

I find the move against private property rights very disturbing, don't you?

And, are you o.k. with what Obama is doing, by accelerating the trend against private property rights? Isn't it shameful for him to use his bully pulpit to disparage those (i.e., bond holders) fighting for their rights, when their rights under the law conflict with what he wants?

__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."