Quote:
Originally Posted by Tully Mars
I really can't claim to know but based on the rulings she actually issued I'd say it isn't what you seem to think it is/was.
|
Interesting way to answer the question. I came to the conclusion that her words where b.s. and that she was pandering to her audience, simply saying what she thought they wanted to hear. I think she takes her role as a judge seriously and I can not imagine she actually believes that ethnicity/gender has anything to do with a jurist coming to just decisions.
---------- Post added at 05:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:22 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
ace, i believe that the text which surrounded the factoid presented as if it were a problem of some kind in the op has already been posted. the way you work out what she meant is that you read the text. you know, check out the context. this isn't rocket science.
geez, you'd think that reading in context was going to give you a rash or something.
|
If it was that simple in this the age of obama speak. For example what did obama mean when he talked to lefties in S.F. about those people clinging to their religion and guns. What did that mean? Obama people seem to talk in code to certain audiences.
And, if it was so, so simple why can't I get direct answers to my simple questions?