Quote:
The Obama administration continues to defy the judge in the lawsuit over warrantless electronic surveillance in the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation case, refusing this weekend to release a top-secret document and continuing a Bush administration claim of “state secrets” in the case. The judge has ordered the lawyers to court to explain why he shouldn’t just issue a summary judgment on behalf of the plaintiffs, which the Department of Justice opposes:
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Obama administration insists it has no obligation to provide access to a top secret document in a wiretapping case, setting up a showdown next week with the judge who ordered it released.
Justice Department lawyers, in a response Friday with the U.S. District Court in San Francisco, also argued that Judge Vaughn Walker had no cause to penalize the government over its refusal to turn over the document.
Walker on May 22 threatened to punish the administration for withholding the document, which he ordered given to lawyers suing the government over its warrantless wiretapping program.
The judge has ordered department lawyers to appear before his court Wednesday to make the case why he should not award damages to the now-defunct Oregon chapter of the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation. That group is challenging the wiretapping program.
In its response, the department said that in this case "disclosure of classified information—even under protective order—would create intolerable risks to national security."
The filing said President Barack Obama has authorized access to classified information on a "need-to-know" basis and argued that the government "cannot be sanctioned for its determination that plaintiffs do not have a need to know classified information."
The Al-Haramain case has been a focal point for civil liberties groups questioning the legality of the warrantless wiretapping program, and has become one of several instances where the current administration has taken its cue from the Bush administration in citing national security as justification for keeping secrets.
Attorney General Eric Holder has ordered a review of all state secrets used by the Bush administration to protect anti-terrorism programs from lawsuits. But the Obama administration is also fighting the court-ordered release of prisoner-abuse photos and is reviving, in a revised form, military tribunals where suspected terrorists have limited access to information.
The Bush administration inadvertently turned over the top secret document to Al-Haramain lawyers, who claimed it proved illegal wiretapping by the National Security Agency.
The document was returned to the government, and the lawyers have argued they need the document back to prove their case.
The Treasury Department in 2004 designated the charity as an organization that supports terrorism.
|
Nobody can say they didn't see it coming -- or they didn't have the imagination to see it coming. Apart from being a politician, Barama-san was an unknown quantity from Day One. Oh, we knew he was smart and cunning, but apart from that, nobody knew squat. Nobody knew squat because there was nothing to know; the man never ran anything. People were howling in the streets not to put an inexperienced senator with zero governing experience in the White House in charge of America at such a sensitive time. Barama had 2 things going for him that proved irresistible to the faithful: George W. Bush and Charisma. It's been scientifically proven that babies are more attracted to so-called "beautiful" faces (beauty, which in this case also scientifically explained by such characteristics as bone structure, symmetry, facial expression), and such was the spellbinding powers El Barama commandeered.
I never had a problem with the Patriot Act, wiretapping, the privilege of state secrets, the revival of the Bush Administration Military Commission, enhanced interrogation so it makes no difference to me. I think Barama is doing the right things to maintain the security of the country, and I especially like that its an articulate, intellectual liberal doing it this time around. Because if an articulate intellectual liberal says these things must be upheld, then its somehow more legit.