View Single Post
Old 05-31-2009, 07:18 AM   #12 (permalink)
cker
Upright
 
Location: Alabama
To my view, prostitution seems like it could/should be legal, but I would have a question about social benefits: if a woman loses her job and her unemployment et c. are contingent on her taking any job that's available, could that mean she might have to do prostitution as a "job" to keep her benefits? That's kind of a straw-man argument, but the notion bears though. How do you handle the management of the public health risks? How do you regulate it, if at all? What level of advertising do you allow - advertising tobacco is regulated, what about sex work? What about the inevitable picket-lines and intimidation from the more hardcore religious opponentes - theyre not going away, even if legalized prostitution is in place. In the US, though, the conversation will never get to that point because prostitution is morally offensive to a large chunk of the voting population, mainly for religious reasons. It seems to be okay to trade sexual favors for lavish spending, though; perhaps it's okay if you're using the barter system.

One conern that needs to be considered regarding legalization of certain self-administered pharmaceutical enhancements is, again, the social effect. I think marijuana should be, in some way, legalized. It's a fair question to ask what the social implications of legal weed would be - it's another intoxicant with which people can distract themselves. Consider the impact of alcohol abuse on employment, domestic situations, et c. Does it become an age-enabled right-to-buy or a licensed privelege? My hunch is that we'd see some slice of the population use for a little while - probably a bigger slice than anyone thinks - basically indulging in dissipative behavior... then it would calm down. The Netherlands has substantially lower marijuana usage than the US, despite the legalized status of cannabis in that country (at least according to drugfacts.org). In my opinion we need a rational drug policy, and if we're going to ban weed because it's harmful then tobacco should be taken off the market - it is FAR more harmful to public health. I've got no numbesr to back it up but I suspect the dollar-cost of tobacco in terms of healthcare, lost workforce, et c. is higher than any of us think.

But again - some people have a moral/religious dislike of certain intoxicants (seems like for most of that population, beer has become OK). I recall my parents hiding their drinking from the church people when it was pretty clear almost everyone drank there - but were intent on not acknowledging it in public.

Last edited by cker; 05-31-2009 at 07:23 AM..
cker is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360