Quote:
Originally Posted by inBOIL
Wouldn't science fit into your definition? Or at least the branches of science that deal with understanding humans (e.g. psychology, medicine). .
|
Yes, and that's because I don't think the two differ on a basic level. Saying art is completely subjective is like saying it's existence is defined by it's non-existence. There has to be structure in some way for it to exist.
The big difference is in the first sentence. Art is expressionistic while Science is more evidential. Or something similar.